r v emmett 1999 case summary

Richard Barton (Stephens & Son, Chatham) for the applicant; Andrew Brierley (CPS) for the respondents. Richard Davies QC (Vizards) for the appellant; Nigel Baker QC, Desmond Bloom-Davis (Antony Gorley & Co, Newbury) for the respondent. 1.Introduction. Had she been aware, she would not have submitted to the intercourse. Therefore, there would be two middle characters a and v, we print the second middle character. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: case reports and literature review. . Notwithstanding their sexual overtones, these cases are considered to be violent crimes and it is not an excuse that one partner consents. Further, the law cannot expect people suddenly to become honest with each other and to counsel the use of condoms, and there may be negative consequences if HIV was to be disclosable, because those who ought to take medical advice and undergo tests, might be discouraged from doing so. He had administered a date rape drug. This is an application of the general rule that, once an actus reus with an appropriate mens rea has been established, no defense can be admitted, but the evidence may be admitted to mitigate the sentence. The challenges faced by this new therapeutic tool are (i) finding valid evaluation criteria for response assessment; (ii) knowing and distinguishing between "atypical" response patterns; (iii) using PET biomarkers as predictive and . In Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory, there is no consent where the complainant is so affected by alcohol or other drugs as "to be incapable of freely agreeing" to the sexual activity. Till was born to working-class parents on the South Side of Chicago. THE PRIMARY purpose of the Law Society's jurisdiction to intervene in a solicitor's practice under s 35 of and Pt I of Sch I to the Solicitors Act 1974 was the protection of the public against the activities of a dishonest or incompetent solicitor. (it may be that this is to apply in the Court of Appeal only, but this is unclear from the . Google Scholar. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. "Consenting adult" and "Consenting adults" redirect here. trader joe's chocolate ganache cake LIVE; madison 56ers apparel; r v emmett 1999 case summary. On the second, she suffered burns, which became infected. WHERE JUSTICES were sitting as a youth court they could make a secure training order for 12 months under s 1 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, since the well-established provisions in ss 31 and 133 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, which limited them to imposing a sentence of six months' detention for a single offence, were explicitly couched in terms of imprisonment and did not apply to secure training orders. Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Nevertheless, at trial BM was found guilty of three offences of wounding with intent under s.18 of the OAPA. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. R v Brown Commentary Pankti Vadalia To explore the development of the Criminal Law in the field of non-fatal sexual offences using the landmark English case of R v Brown [1994] 1 AC 212. Text for H.R.2471 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 In each case, their sexual partners would not have consented had they known the truth and a reasonable person might be expected to realise this. He was convicted on the basis that the complainants had only consented to acts medical in nature and not to indecent behaviour, that is, there was consent to the nature of the act but not its quality. However, Baker points out that R v. Brown is more borderline, as the harm in that case was reversible and is not too different from having unnecessary plastic surgery that is no longer benefiting the patientthat is numerous surgical procedures which are clearly having a disfiguring rather than beneficial cosmetic effect. They were cheering on the boxers whose conduct was likely to and did produce a breach of the peace, so any mutual consent given by the fighters was vitiated by the public nature of the entertainment irrespective of the degree of injury caused or intended. A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media In R v Coney (1882) 8 QBD 534, members of the public who attended an illegal prize fight in a public place were convicted of aiding and abetting an assault. He had neither. Continue with Recommended Cookies, The defendant appealed against conviction after being involved in sexual activity which he said was not intended to cause harm, and were said to be consensual, but clearly did risk harm. Gan SC, Barr J, Arieff AI, et al. Consent provides no defence to murder, but, according to the group, more than 60 people have been killed in cases where the male defendants claimed the victim consented to having serious harm inflicted upon them for sexual gratification, which it argued means they lacked the intent to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. On 25 October 1994 in the Crown Court at Exeter a number of accused including Brian Emmett and Michael Emmett pleaded guilty to the offence of being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the prohibition on the importation of a controlled drug contrary to section 170 (2) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979. The injuries were inflicted during consensual homosexual sadomasochist activities. It is not the states business to sentence people to multiple years in prison for consensual sex.. Click the column heading to activate the filter (the heading will become Red). Rose LJ, Wright and Kay JJ [1999] EWCA Crim 1710, [1999] No. Start your Independent Premium subscription today. After that, 5 ml of APTES was added and the system was refluxed at 80 C for 24 hours under a nitrogen atmosphere. Leaving aside repugnance and moral objection, both of which are entirely natural, but neither of which are in my opinion grounds upon which the court could properly create a new crime.. [3], The issue of consent in the course of sado-masochistic sexual activity was considered in R v Stein (2007), a case in which a participant died as a result of being gagged. The defendant now appealed saying that the judge had an independent . The activity had in fact been ongoing for more than ten years and the participants had "positively wanted, asked for, the acts to be done to them . All that she consented to was a ride in the car, which in itself is irrelevant to the offence and a different thing from that with which Mr Cort is charged". Autonomy is a cornerstone of criminal law; the principle wherein an adult with full capacity is able to self-govern. The pH of the BC solution was measured by filtering the suspension of 0.1 g BC: 20 mL Milli-Q water with 4-h end-over-end rotation (30 rpm) and centrifugation (4000 rpm, 10 min) [19]. ", Clarke, "Law and Order on the Courts: The Application of Criminal Liability for Intentional Fouls During Sporting Events", (2000) Vol. Updated: 19 January 2022; Ref: scu.158110. The key issue facing the Court was whether consent was a valid defence to assault in these circumstances. On a different occasion, she agreed that he could pour fuel from a lighter onto her breasts and set fire to the fuel. Background: Early rapid weight gain is associated with later overweight, which implies that weight centile crossing tracks over time.Objective: Centile crossing is defined in terms of the change or deviation in weight z score during 1 mo, and the correlations between successive deviations are explored at different ages.Design: Two Cambridge (United Kingdom) growth cohorts were used: Widdowson . T he case of five men jailed for engaging in consensual sadomasochistic sexual acts is one of the few judgments that most law students actually read, and the facts tend to stay with them. In this work, a surface cationized inorganic-organic hybrid foam was produced from porous geopolymer (GP) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). The federal government has quietly revived its investigation into the murder of Emmett Till, the 14-year-old African-American boy whose abduction and killing remains, almost 63 . In my opinion it should be a case about the criminal law of private sexual relations, if about anything at all, said Lord Mustill said. But public policy requires courts to lay down limits on the extent to which citizens are allowed to consent or are to be bound by apparent consent given. The ruling on consent, and the limits of the intrusion of criminal law in peoples sexual relationships, has been criticised by many since as paternalistic and homophobic. Where the culture supports the playing of practical jokes and active physical interaction as a form of "fun", those who become a part of that culture must accept the local standards of contact and the injuries that might result. Even professional sport should have an element of fun while the players are, in the more extreme cases, given criminal as well as civil law protection (see R v Johnson (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 343 and R v Lloyd (1989) CLR 513 dealing with injuries inflicted on the rugby field in "off the ball" incidents). Optident Ltd and anor v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and another; CA (Morritt, Sedley LJJ, Lindsay J) 1 July 1999. This is a case about the criminal law of violence. Myles Jackman, a leading obscenity lawyer, says the Brown case is still the legal guideline for bodily autonomy, agency, consent in sexual relations and body modification. 5SAH LCCSA Encrochat Webinar Lecture Notes from 29 July 2020, Youth & Video Remand Hearings Principles & Procedure document, London Sites Reopening w/c 15th June 2020, 5SAH LCCSA Webinar Loss of Control v Diminished Responsibility: Mark Cotter QC & Benjamin Burge 14th July @ 3:30pm, Free Webinar on the new Sentencing Code due to come into force on 1st October 2020, 5SAH & LCCSA Webinar The New Sentencing Code Demystifying Risk Assessments, Payment, Delivery, Refunds and Cancellations Policy. The more modern authorities involving the transmission of psychological conditions and in other sexual matters, reject the notion that consent can be a defence to anything more than a trivial injury. Timothy Dutton QC (Wright Son & Pepper) for the Law Society; Ian McCulloch, Nigel Brockley (Straw & Pearce, Loughborough) for the solicitor. swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. sinners in the hands of an angry god analysis worksheet / bacnet object types table / bacnet object types table For sado-masochism, R v Boyea (1992) 156 JPR 505 was another application of the ratio decidendi in Donovan that even if she had actually consented to injury by allowing the defendant to put his hand into her vagina and twist it, causing internal and external injuries to her vagina and bruising on her pubis, the woman's consent (if any) would have been irrelevant. On appeal the conviction was quashed. Chromium, especially hexavalent chromium, can be released into the environment from a variety of industrial sources, like leather processing and finishing, steel processing, ceramic processing, electroplating, catalytic manufacture and drilling muds (Barnhart, 1997, Darrie, 2001, Jacobs and Testa, 2005).Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is the most common Cr species, is highly toxic . The Court held that the identity of the defendant was not a feature which, in that case, precluded the giving of consent by the patient. The decision in the Brown case flowed from detailed consideration of three earlier authorities, R v Coney (1882) 8 QBD 534, R v Donovan [1934] 2 KB 498 and Attorney General's Reference (No. Three years later, in the case of R v Wilson, which involved a husband branding his initials on his wifes buttocks with a hot knife, the court of appeal reached the opposite result, ruling that the man had the defence of consent. Judge LJ. ALTHOUGH R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 was not authority in all circumstances for the proposition that consent did not form a basis for a defence in cases of sado-masochistic prac-tices, nevertheless when the realistic risk was of more than transient injury the issue of consent became immaterial. Breeze v John Stacey & Sons Ltd; CA (Peter Gibson, Judge, Clarke LJJ) 21 June 1999. The formula is: E+R=O (Event + Response = Outcome) The basic idea is that every outcome you experience in life (whether it is success or failure, wealth or poverty, health or illness, intimacy or estrangement, joy or frustration) is the result of how you have responded to an earlier event or events in your life. CA allow the appeal saying that this was distinct from Brown since (1) there was no . In other words, the court distinguished between "willingly running the risk of transmission" and "willingly consenting to the risk of transmission.". The appellants in. A defence against criminal liability may arise when a defendant can argue that, because of consent, there was no crime (e.g., arguing that permission was given to use an automobile, so it was not theft or taken without owner's consent). The court applied Brown and ruled that the woman's consent to these events did not provide a defence for her partner. R V Emmett 1999 Case Summary; Is Flag Football Safer Than Tackle; Basra Airport News Today; That was not to say, however, that the court would lightly disregard obligations entered into freely under a contract. Their Lordships in the Court of That involved the appellant, himself, feeling the breasts of two of the women and using a stethoscope beneath the bra of the third woman. Non Specialist Summary. "It is difficult to see how one could ever consent to that once fraud was indeed established. The. .Cited Regina v Coutts HL 19-Jul-2006 The defendant was convicted of murder. Judgement for the case R v Wilson. r v emmett 1999 case summary Best Selling Author and International Speaker. In the Australian Capital Territory, the effect of alcohol or other drugs is less qualified; there is no consent if it is caused by "the effect of intoxicating liquor, a drug or anaesthetic". The court took judicial notice of the change in social attitudes to sexual matters, but "the extent of the violence inflicted went far beyond the risk of minor injury to which, if she did consent, her consent would have been a defence". he case of five men jailed for engaging in consensual sadomasochistic sexual acts is one of the few judgments that most law students actually read, and the facts tend to stay with them. OCGA 9-11-56 (c) ." Lau's Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 ( 405 S.E.2d 474) (1991). . BG, BG-Mg 3 and BG-Mg 5, were surface-functionalized with 3-aminopropyl groups by using a post-grafting procedure.Briefly, one gram of bioactive glass powder was dispersed in 100 ml of toluene by ultrasonication for 30 minutes. Please send all comments, corrections or suggested revisions to openlaw@bailii.org. Informacin detallada del sitio web y la empresa: nolrthamilton.com No LRT Hamilton - Say NO to the LRT in Hamilton, and YES to less expensive green technology. Baker also argues that the Harm Principle provides an important constraint, as it prevents the consenter from being criminalized because it is only harm to others that is criminalisable under the Harm Principlenot harm to self. Citing: Cited - Regina v Emmett CACD 18-Jun-1999 The defendant appealed against conviction after being involved in sexual activity which he said was not intended to cause harm, and were said to be consensual, but clearly did risk harm. Here the culpable act was not holding the reins, which was not the . . Judicial review; contraception; minors under 16; 'concealed' necessity. . Her consent is not properly informed, and she cannot give an informed consent to something of which she is ignorant. In R v Emmett [1999], the defendant was charged under Section 47 of the OAPA 1861 after - following her requests - tying a plastic bag over his girlfriend's head and, on a separate occasion, setting alight lighter fuel he had poured over her breasts. Evidence during the trial suggested a possibility of manslaughter, but neither the defence nor prosecution proposed the alternate verdict. r v emmett 1999 case summary. This does not give sport a license to enact rules permitting acts that are clearly, excessively and maliciously violent. shane kilcher house; ridge hill apartments for rent; example of psycholinguistics in daily life; beda appointment dan meeting di outlook; . A paper on the website The Student Lawyer examined the basis for fraud as grounds for negating consent, in the context of the decision not to charge officers involved in the UK undercover policing relationships scandal. .Cited Meachen, Regina v CACD 20-Oct-2006 The appellant appealed his conviction for anal rape. R v Emmett [1999] EWCA Crim 1710; Case No. The Coney case concerned spectators at a prize fight who were prosecuted as secondary participants in any offence committed by the . In R v Donovan (1934) AER 207 in which Swift J. stated the general rule that: No person can license another to commit a crime, if (the jury) were satisfied that the blows struck were likely or intended to do bodily harm they ought to convict only if they were not so satisfied (was it) necessary to consider the further question whether the prosecution had negatived consent. Judicial review; assisted suicide; euthanasia; necessity; ECHR Art.8, Child; effective participation in trial; ECHR Art.6, Insanity; automatism; epilepsy; non-fatal assault: GBH, Insanity; automatism; diabetes; non-fatal assault: ABH, Insanity; automatism; diabetes; TWOC; disqualified driving, Insanity: 'nature and quality of act'; murder, Insanity; automatism; mental disorder; voluntary intoxication; voluntary control, Attorney-General's Reference (No. They wanted transport, not kidnapping. [5], Alzheimer's disease or similar disabilities may result in a person being unable to give legal consent to sexual relations even with their spouse. Hunza Guides is Pakistan's top mountain destination management company offering full board tours, trekking and expeditions services in Pakistan. 7. The men had fought inside the bar, but had been kicked out and continued fighting outside. grand united order of odd fellows Menu Toggle; coastal vacation rentals holden beach Violence in Sport and the Criminal Law. NOTWITHSTANDING THAT that a product supplied to dentists for bleaching teeth had been assigned a "CE mark" in Germany as a "medical device" under the terms of Council Directive (EEC) 93/42 on medical devices, the product was in fact a "cosmetic product" within the meaning of Council Directive (EEC) 76/769 and accordingly, since it contained a significantly higher concentration of peroxide than was permitted under that Directive, it could not lawfully be marketed in the United Kingdom. Only full case reports are accepted in court. Now the ruling in R v Chan-Fook [1994] 1 WLR 689, which held that psychiatric injury could be actual bodily harm, has been confirmed by the House of Lords in R v Burstow, R v Ireland [1998] 1 Cr App R 177. The case, she recalls, involved a group of ordinary men who happened to be homosexual and into S&M, who occasionally got together to act out fantasies, got sexual stimulation, and had a cup of tea at the end. R v Rai [1999] EWCA Crim 2250; [2000] 1 Cr App R 242: Court of Appeal (EWCA Crim) Deception; failure to disclose change in circumstances: 379: Consent cannot be inferred by reason of any words or conduct of a victim where the victim is incapable of giving genuine consent, In Australia, if a sexual partner was asleep, unconscious or a jury decides that a complainant was unable to consent, sexual contact is considered rape. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. The case of five men jailed for engaging in consensual sadomasochistic sexual acts became a legal guideline. 2002;15:398-402. Select the Number heading or refresh your browser to reset to the original/default sort order (Dark Blue). Each of the three women said that they had only consented because they thought the appellant had either medical qualifications or relevant training. Immunotherapy is based on manipulation of the immune system in order to act against tumour cells, with growing evidence especially in melanoma patients. Re a Solicitor; Ch D (Jonathan Parker J) 18 June 1999. why was carrie's sister dropped from king of queens . But in the context of sadomasochism, Lord Mustill in R v Brown (1993)[2] has set the level just below actual bodily harm. However the Appeal Court judges ruled that before the complainants' consent could provide the appellant with a defence, it had to be an informed and willing consent to the specific risk, here the risk of contracting HIV, rather than the general one of contracting something. These highly porous GPs were combined at pH 7.5 with cationic CNCs that had been synthesized from . 134 Criminal Law Consent and Offences against the Person; A Response on the Issues for Sports and Games' by the Central Council of Physical Recreation, submitted by Peter Lawson, General Secretary, (1995) 3 Sport and the Law Journal 4, This page was last edited on 30 January 2023, at 13:54. Auteur/autrice de la publication : Post published: 16 juin 2022; It concluded that the issues which might arise if this was a legal basis to negate consent, could be far wider than might be first appreciated. However, consent is valid in a range of circumstances, including contact sports (such as boxing or mixed martial arts), as well as tattooing and piercing. In 1998, the Home Office issued a consultation paper entitled Violence: Reforming the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 rejecting the Law Commission's recommendation that there should be offences for the intentional or reckless transmission of disease. Lord Templeman said public policy meant the law should protect people from the unpredictably dangerous and degrading practices that involved genital torture and violence to the buttocks, anus, penis, testicles and nipples. The Court answered in the negative. It was not suggested that any rape . This suggests that consent will only operate as a defense in all but the most exceptional of cases where there has already been prior disclosure of known HIV positive status. By September 2009, he had infected her with an incurable genital herpes virus. The act was considered comparable to tattooing, whilst Brown applied specifically to sadomasochism. .See Also Regina v Emmett (Stephen Roy) CACD 15-Oct-1999 When the CPS intends to seek an order for costs against a defendant, in future, the defendant must be given notice of the intention to make the application. The defendant was convicted of manslaughter under section 20 and 47 OAPA. WHERE A party to litigation saw another party's documents without privilege being claimed for them, he was. The second ceremony will do no more than expose the prospective spouse to a charge of bigamy. The Concise Oxford English Dictionary defines crime as; "act (usually grave offence) punishable by law; evil act; such acts collectively" It will be noted that many crimes are also torts and vice-versa. Silence in these circumstances is incongruous with honesty, or with a genuine belief that there is an informed consent. A majority ruling in the House of Lords said the fact that the men had consented to the acts, which included inserting fish hooks through the penis and nailing foreskin and scrotum to a board, provided no defence. R v Emmett; CA, Crim Div (Rose LJ, Wright, Kay JJ) 18 June 1999. how to spot an undercover cop australia; defense criminal investigative service jobs near berlin; mission vista high school calendar; On August 28, 1955, while visiting family in Money, Mississippi, 14-year-old Emmett Till, an African American from Chicago, is brutally murdered for allegedly flirting with a white woman four. 32, The Law Commission: Consultation Paper No. Following a campaign by the group We Cant Consent to This, an amendment to the domestic violence bill seeks to establish in legislation the legal principle from Brown that a person cannot consent to actual bodily harm or other more serious injury. For the faint of heart, I will exclude details of the acts but they were very extreme. if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[320,100],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3','ezslot_5',114,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3-0'); Cited by: Cited Regina v Dica CACD 5-May-2004 Reckless HIV transmission Grievous Bodily Harm The defendant appealed against his conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm. Table 2 presents the chemical characteristics of BC. The learned judge, in giving his ruling said: In this case, the degree of actual and potential harm was such and also the degree of unpredictability as to injury was such as to make it a proper cause [for] the criminal law to intervene. Most law students are familiar with the infamous case of R V Brown, in which several homosexual men filmed themselves consenting in sadomasochistic activities. The disagreement over whether the case was about violence or sex, led to the 3:2 split between the judges. In R v Emmett (unreported, 18 June 1999), as part of their consensual sexual activity, the woman allowed her partner to cover her head with a plastic bag, tying it tightly at the neck. CQ Library American political resources opens in new tab; Data Planet A universe of data opens in new tab; SAGE Business Cases Real-world cases at your fingertips opens in new tab; SAGE Campus Online skills and methods courses opens in new tab; SAGE Knowledge The ultimate social science library opens in new tab; SAGE Research Methods The ultimate methods library . R v Medway Youth Court, ex p A; QBD, Div Ct (Auld LJ, Hughes J) 10 June 1999. Gross negligence manslaughter; Liability for omissions: duty of care, Liability for omissions; manslaughter; parent/child, Liability for omissions; manslaughter; parent/non-dependent child, Liability for omissions; assumption of responsibility; manslaughter, Liability for omissions; assumption of responsibility: drug takers; manslaughter, liability for omissions; contractual duty; manslaughter, Liability for omissions; creation of a dangerous situation; arson, Liability for omissions; police officer: misconduct in public office, Withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment; act/omission distinction; murder, Liability for omissions; gross indecency with a child, Liability for omissions; performance of duty: extent of duty, Causation; causing death by driving whilst uninsured/without a licence, Causation; causing death by driving whilst uninsured; aggravated vehicle taking, Causation; intervening events; death by dangerous driving, Causation; intervening acts of third party: drug importation, Causation; intervening acts of third party; manslaughter, Environment Agency v Empress Car Co (Abertillary) Ltd, Causation; intervening act of third party; pollution; strict liability, Causation; intervening acts of third party; medical treatment; murder, Causation; intervening act of victim; assault occasioning ABH, Causation; intervening act of victim; manslaughter, Causation; intervening act of victim: lapse of time; manslaughter, Causation; drug use: intervening act of victim; manslaughter, Causation; drug use: joint administration; manslaughter, Causation; supply of drugs; duty of care; gross negligence manslaughter, Causation; pre-existing medical condition: 'take your victim as you find them'; manslaughter, Causation; Jehovah's Witness: 'take your victim as you find them'; manslaughter, Causation; intervening act of victim: suicide; murder, Causation; intervening act of victim: suicide; recognisable psychiatric injury; manslaughter/GBH, Mens rea, intention; motive; doing acts likely to assist the enemy, Re A (conjoined twins: surgical separation), Separation conjoined twins: civil declaration; intention; necessity; murder, Motive; moral purpose; conspiracy to commit breach of the Official Secrets Act 1911, Malice; Mens rea; Offences against the person, Intoxication; mens rea; recklessness; specific/basic intent; arson, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; murder, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; continuing act; assault, Transferred malice; unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter, Attorney General's Reference (No.3 of 1994), Transferred malice; murder/manslaughter; GBH rule, Transferred malice; accessories: joint enterprise; murder; Tyrell principle, Mistake; presumption of mens rea: strict liability; inciting a girl under 14 to commit an act of gross indecency, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability, Gammon Ltd. V Attorney General of Hong Kong, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; ECHR Art.7, Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Storkwain Ltd, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; funding terrorism, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; freedom of expression; proscribed organisations; terrorism offences, Strict liability; rape of a child; ECHR arts.

How Would These Characteristics Enable The Plants To Survive, Who Did Gerard Canonico Play In Glee, Pulaski County Breaking News, Where Does Claude Dallas Live Today, Articles R